IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
anyone using cd dae to extract .wav...
onthejazz
post May 15 2002, 12:11
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 117
Joined: 2-April 02
From: Minnesota
Member No.: 1666



there is a program distributed at the cd speed homepage called cd dae, it doesnt do error correction, but it does seem to do an accurate error check. its a very simple program, it rips fast and seems to be quite accurate (with verify enabled). for cd's that are in decent shape can anyone comment on wether this is or would be a good alternative to eac & cdex.

just exploring some of the options out there.

CD DAE - 0.4B - Windows - cddae_04.zip - 276 KB
here is a link to it http://www.cdspeed2000.com/go.php3?link=cddae.html


thanks,
dave
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Volcano
post May 15 2002, 13:57
Post #2





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 916
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Berlin, Germany
Member No.: 112



Err? Do I see correctly that it has no support for encoders of any kind? WTF...

I should think the "verify" option (which means that the track is read twice) is roughly the same as EAC's burst mode "Test & Copy" - accurate, but no error reporting. That is not enough "security" IMHO.

But why use anything else than EAC/CDex anyway? wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
onthejazz
post May 16 2002, 00:01
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 117
Joined: 2-April 02
From: Minnesota
Member No.: 1666



there is error reporting within this program. and it seems as stingy at ripping as EAC too..
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Volcano
post May 17 2002, 13:14
Post #4





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 916
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Berlin, Germany
Member No.: 112



Ah, but how do you know that the error reporting is as reliable as EAC's? If my assumption that the tool only uses jitter corrected or burst mode is correct, it would only provide very vague error reporting.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cd-rw.org
post May 18 2002, 12:11
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 176
Joined: 5-October 01
Member No.: 217



Volcano: It performes a double-read.

Not too impressive program. EAC is still the no.1 by far.


--------------------
http://www.bitburners.com - We Burn a Bit
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Volcano
post May 18 2002, 12:54
Post #6





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 916
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Berlin, Germany
Member No.: 112



QUOTE
Volcano: It performes a double-read.

Yep, that's why I compared it to EAC's "Test & Copy" feature. I suppose this is roughly the same, isn't it?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd December 2014 - 06:17