IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
EAC failed reading, CDEX didn't...... Help, Help Request
blueaxe
post May 20 2005, 09:09
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 8-March 05
Member No.: 20460



Hi everybody,
I hope anybody could help me.
I installed EAC and set it following a translation in Italian of a EAC Install. guide; and until yesterday I didn't have problems.

My last try was with a 9not well) copied audio cd.
EAC failed, and only 4 of 13 tracks were translated in wav and then in mp3, because of errors with offset.

I used another software, CD-EX with the same cd and it did't have any problems, and I have my mp3.

QUESTION: I installed EAC because I read it's the best copier, but why did it fail wav extraction and EAC not? Where can I find other good (and well working) settings for EAC ?


Many thanks in advance
Blueaxe mad.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Martin H
post May 21 2005, 03:49
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 857
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Denmark
Member No.: 20365



Good EAC guides :
http://users.pandora.be/satcp/tutorials.htm
http://home-12.tiscali-business.nl/~tpm54044/

EAC vs. CDEX :
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....=ST&f=20&t=3164

-Martin.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Teqnilogik
post May 21 2005, 05:31
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 25-January 04
From: USA
Member No.: 11500



I actually created my own EAC guide to help people learn how to use it and get it working rather quickly. Check it out and see if it helps you.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
liekloo
post May 21 2005, 09:11
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 456
Joined: 22-March 02
From: Belgium
Member No.: 1596



QUOTE (blueaxe @ May 20 2005, 09:09 AM)
QUESTION: I installed EAC because I read it's the best copier, but why did it fail wav extraction and CDex not?

EAC is called "the best" for its ability to report errors if there were any, not its ability to recover them.

If a ripper like EAC or CDex says "no errors in your rip" it actually means "I haven't seen any errors" but actually there might be errors that the ripper overlooked. How many, depends on how good the ripper is. CDex (in paranoia!) and EAC (correctly configured & secure mode!) are both good rippers, but EAC is said to be "the best" because it only rarely overlooks an error. So, if EAC says "no errors in your rip" you can believe it. That's the difference with other rippers.

Though not as good as EAC, CDex is good also (at least in paranoia). If you want maximum certainty about your rip you could clean the CD (e.g. brasso) and then rip it with EAC (which will no longer fail).

This post has been edited by liekloo: May 21 2005, 09:13


--------------------
"E S S E N T I A L" Guide for E A C :

http://users.fulladsl.be/spb2267/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
westgroveg
post May 21 2005, 09:43
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 1236
Joined: 5-October 01
Member No.: 220



Another test I performed with a damaged CD

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....wtopic=27378&hl
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st August 2014 - 08:15