IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Why no Vorbis 2-pass?
gameplaya15143
post Aug 25 2006, 01:27
Post #51





Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 8-January 06
From: Earth
Member No.: 26978



2pass encoding is only usefull to speed up the process of getting the most quality out of a given file size (I say 'speed up' because trial & error is the alternative method).

I have yet to see any circumstance where 2pass audio encoding is more usefull than 1pass vbr rolleyes.gif
Does anybody know of any at all?

For video encoding 2pass is very usefull, since the trial & error method is extremely time consuming.


--------------------
Vorbis-q0-lowpass99
lame3.93.1-q5-V9-k-nspsytune
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HbG
post Aug 25 2006, 02:00
Post #52





Group: Members
Posts: 289
Joined: 12-May 03
From: The Hague
Member No.: 6555



What about listening tests where a specific average bitrate for the collection of samples may be desired?


--------------------
Veni Vidi Vorbis.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fpi
post Aug 25 2006, 08:21
Post #53





Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 24-October 05
Member No.: 25326



QUOTE (gameplaya15143 @ Aug 24 2006, 18:27) *
I have yet to see any circumstance where 2pass audio encoding is more usefull than 1pass vbr rolleyes.gif
Does anybody know of any at all?


Rehuff can be used only with a two pass encoding (altought this is not the same two pass of video encoding, this is really a two pass).
More infos on rehuff:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev...ust/018522.html
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2014 - 01:21