Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Sparsing (Read 3704 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sparsing

I've heard of sush thing called "sparsing". What is that?
Also plz give me information about differences between "athtype 3" and "athtype 2" and which of them produces higher quality?

Sparsing

Reply #1
Quote
Originally posted by B@RLoG I
've heard of sush thing called "sparsing". What is that?

Uh oh, sounds familiar. Maybe I should know this?!?

Quote
Also plz give me information about differences between "athtype 3" and "athtype 2" and which of them produces higher quality?
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showth...thtype#post4656

athtype 3 was derived from athtype 2 (by raising the type 2 low freq curve)
athtype 2 is more sensitive and leads to higher bitrates.
Juha Laaksonheimo

Sparsing

Reply #2
"Sparsing" is a combination of the words "sparse" and "parsing."  In its simplest form it means simply incompletely parsing the data you have as input (or taking only sparse samples from it) - a common technique is quadratic sparsing, in which you take samples 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, etc., throwing out the ones in between.  In more refined forms it is often used with predictive algorithms to throw away data that is likely to be uninteresting (instead of just throwing out arbitrary data as with quadratic sparsing).  It's a technique often used in physics applications to try to turn gigabytes of experimental data into something manageable.

In terms of LAME, I'm not 100% sure what it is being used to refer to.  The entire psychoacoustic model would seem to be some sort of a predictive algorithm to do intelligent sparsing (throw out data that is unlikely to be audible).  Searching google I also encountered use of the term to refer to zeroing out pairs of side-channel samples to reduce the content of the side channel in M/S stereo, which might just be one specific instance where the term is used: http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/mp3encode...May/002859.html

But generally almost everything to do with perceptual encoding could probably be described as "sparsing," though in the audio-coding community it might only be used to refer to one particular instance; someone more familiar with the community than I will have to answer how the term is generally used in the context of mp3-coding.