Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Apparently HA is 'bad science' and doesn't do debate (Read 6263 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Apparently HA is 'bad science' and doesn't do debate

I hope this is the right place, it's normally audio related stuff I post

I just thought this amusing reply to a reply that I'd made was worth pointing at. The discussion is around whether or not to use speaker grills or not. I said I can't tell any difference which is apparently the wrong answer, yet HA "don't encourage debate" and is "bad science".

Anyway, I thought it was funny.

http://www.avforums.com/forums/18397804-post14.html
http://www.avforums.com/forums/music/17330...ker-grills.html

Apparently HA is 'bad science' and doesn't do debate

Reply #1
Often times it seems to me that we spend an inordinate amount of time debating. Many of these debates involve placebophiles attempting to justify their position. I can't recall them getting any traction and discussions are often closed when the page count of pointlessness reaches critical mass, but they are allowed to post nonetheless (at least initially before TOS 2, 5 & 8 get the better of them in some cases).

Of course this guy won't be bothered to provide evidence for his claims about our forum.

Apparently HA is 'bad science' and doesn't do debate

Reply #2
Often times it seems to me that we spend an inordinate amount of time debating. [...] discussions are often closed when the page count of pointlessness reaches critical mass

Even more than that - to me it seems that discussions here often continue way past "page count of pointlessness" ...becoming almost unreadable due to length.

Apparently HA is 'bad science' and doesn't do debate

Reply #3
>MFW asking for evidence is bad science.

Apparently HA is 'bad science' and doesn't do debate

Reply #4
If that ain't the very foundation of blind faith & fanaticism, I don't know what else is.
Listen to the music, not the media it's on.
União e reconstrução