IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Oggdrop celeron compile
windmiller
post Dec 31 2004, 06:23
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 6-March 04
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Member No.: 12500



Ive got a 2.8 celeron for HTPC so I assume I should use the P3 compile of oggdropxpd?


--------------------
www.losslessaudioblog.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Dec 31 2004, 11:30
Post #2


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (windmiller @ Dec 31 2004, 05:23 AM)
Ive got a 2.8 celeron for HTPC so I assume I should use the P3 compile of oggdropxpd?
*

Yes, or if it supports SSE2, then you could also use the P4 compile. smile.gif


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
QuantumKnot
post Dec 31 2004, 11:45
Post #3





Group: Developer
Posts: 1245
Joined: 16-December 02
From: Australia
Member No.: 4097



Somehow I suspect there won't be much difference in speed between SSE and SSE2. smile.gif

This post has been edited by QuantumKnot: Dec 31 2004, 11:46
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
windmiller
post Dec 31 2004, 14:56
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 6-March 04
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Member No.: 12500



Thanks guys! Now I can get to encoding. I finally got everything squared away. Settings, tagging (thanks to John) and how I am going to sync with a Iriver H320.

Also thanks for all your help! It is very cool that you guys answer questions no matter how simple! Much appreciated!!!

This post has been edited by windmiller: Dec 31 2004, 14:59


--------------------
www.losslessaudioblog.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rudefyet
post Feb 4 2005, 00:02
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 229
Joined: 29-December 03
From: Columbus, Ohio
Member No.: 10785



QUOTE (QuantumKnot @ Dec 31 2004, 02:45 AM)
Somehow I suspect there won't be much difference in speed between SSE and SSE2. smile.gif
*


My Athlon 64 encodes a 4 minute file a whole 3 seconds faster with the SSE2 build laugh.gif

Not much of a difference, but big enough for me biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
c90
post Feb 4 2005, 11:46
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 8-June 03
From: athens
Member No.: 7063



Would that work on a Mendocino Celeron (ancient 366mhz laptop cpu)?


--------------------
"Mars is square and intensely coloured" - Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rudefyet
post Feb 4 2005, 21:36
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 229
Joined: 29-December 03
From: Columbus, Ohio
Member No.: 10785



QUOTE (c90 @ Feb 4 2005, 02:46 AM)
Would that work on a Mendocino Celeron (ancient 366mhz laptop cpu)?
*


That would be a Pentium 2 based celeron...so i'm afaid neither the SSE or SSE2 builds would work on it
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st July 2014 - 12:56