IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Rolling Stone Hi-res releases, not news, but funny
2Bdecided
post Mar 23 2012, 15:00
Post #1


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5060
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



Roll up, roll up, get your Rolling Stones 24-bit 88.2kHz downloads here...

https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=cat...D00018771886723

...what? Quality not good enough for you sir? Pay an extra $10 for the 24-bit 176.4kHZ version here...

https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=cat...X00018771886723

...and hear those 1964 recordings in all their, er, glory. (Play the previews if you don't understand why this is so funny).

Cheers,
David.

P.S. No flames please. I think some of the music is great, and this may well be the best digital release of it - but 176.4kHz for this?!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
benski
post Mar 23 2012, 16:28
Post #2


Winamp Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 670
Joined: 17-July 05
From: Brooklyn, NY
Member No.: 23375



I demand a high enough sample rate to be able to hear the tape-bias signal!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pdq
post Mar 23 2012, 17:20
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 3374
Joined: 1-September 05
From: SE Pennsylvania
Member No.: 24233



That's an interestinmg point. Shouldn't you be able to detect the tape bias frequency in these files?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Mar 23 2012, 17:41
Post #4





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10000
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



Well if it makes Neil Young's ears happy...


--------------------
Placebophiles: put up or shut up!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
D. Lundberg
post Mar 23 2012, 17:44
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 10-November 10
Member No.: 85609



QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 23 2012, 17:20) *
That's an interestinmg point. Shouldn't you be able to detect the tape bias frequency in these files?

That may be what's happening at 28797Hz here:

"Ruby Tuesday" 24/88.2 (from "Through The Past Darkly, Vol.2")


"Paint It Black" 24/88.2 (from "Through The Past Darkly, Vol.2")


Or maybe it's an artifact from the DSD transfer/conversion?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Mar 23 2012, 17:50
Post #6





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10000
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



Nearly 110 db down at 20kHz. Those images really tell the tale. Thanks!


--------------------
Placebophiles: put up or shut up!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kohlrabi
post Mar 23 2012, 17:51
Post #7





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 1004
Joined: 12-March 05
From: Kiel, Germany
Member No.: 20561



I didn't do so before, but now I added HDTracks to my personal axis of evil.


--------------------
Audiophiles live in constant fear of jitter.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ron Jones
post Mar 23 2012, 18:04
Post #8





Group: Members
Posts: 412
Joined: 9-August 07
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 46048



I wouldn't have bought it if they hadn't used cryogenically frozen interconnects. Now that I know that they have, I'm sold!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porcus
post Mar 23 2012, 18:51
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 1842
Joined: 30-November 06
Member No.: 38207



QUOTE (greynol @ Mar 23 2012, 17:50) *
Nearly 110 db down at 20kHz.


Nah, look at where the 0 dB is wink.gif


--------------------
One day in the Year of the Fox came a time remembered well
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Mar 23 2012, 19:12
Post #10


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5060
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (Kohlrabi @ Mar 23 2012, 16:51) *
I didn't do so before, but now I added HDTracks to my personal axis of evil.
You'll love this page then...
https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=sta...name=which_kind

but if people use all this as an excuse to dig out the master tapes, and present an album sounding better than it ever has on CD (even though, of course, it could sound just as good on CD!) then it's nice that they have an excuse to do so, and it's nice to hear classic albums sounding better than ever.

(and in any cases where this is the only release of the better master, I'll just have to downsample it to 44.1kHz and encode it to mp3 myself wink.gif )

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Mar 23 2012, 19:21
Post #11





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10000
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



QUOTE (Porcus @ Mar 23 2012, 10:51) *
Nah, look at where the 0 dB is wink.gif

Even still, ~70 dB down from peak says enough.

EDIT: I had originally said something about the music being incapable of having a peak at 0dB, but that doesn't excuse my mistake. My thinking was more along the question as to whether it's possible to capture the high frequency garbage along with the music (the complete spectrum) using only 16 bits.

This post has been edited by greynol: Mar 23 2012, 20:03


--------------------
Placebophiles: put up or shut up!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Arnold B. Kruege...
post Mar 23 2012, 22:36
Post #12





Group: Members
Posts: 3649
Joined: 29-October 08
From: USA, 48236
Member No.: 61311



QUOTE (pdq @ Mar 23 2012, 12:20) *
That's an interestinmg point. Shouldn't you be able to detect the tape bias frequency in these files?


Hard to tell. Tape bias could be over 100 KHz. 50 Khz is more likely, but that's over the Nyquist for 88 amd 96 KHz sampling.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th July 2014 - 00:32