IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92, Audible differences with APS?
Lev
post Jan 16 2003, 16:03
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: 7-November 02
From: Gloucester, UK
Member No.: 3716



oops, I always thought I had been using 3.90.2, but upon actually opening my eyes and checking, it seems I am using 3.92. I have swapped to 3.90.2, although I cannot tell one little difference whatsoever.

Is there any difference, audibly?


--------------------
http://www.megalev.co.uk
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RIV@NVX
post Jan 16 2003, 16:10
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 574
Joined: 15-December 02
From: Rijeka, Croatia
Member No.: 4090



3.92 is newer, 3.90.2 is older... I don't know about difference.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dev0
post Jan 16 2003, 16:26
Post #3





Group: Developer
Posts: 1679
Joined: 23-December 01
From: Germany
Member No.: 731



There should be no audible difference, but maybe a small one in bitrate, since 3.92 uses different compilerflags.

dev0


--------------------
"To understand me, you'll have to swallow a world." Or maybe your words.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NeoRenegade
post Jan 16 2003, 17:02
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 29-November 01
Member No.: 563



Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.

I personally would recommend 3.90.2 for the VBR presets, and 3.93.1 for the ABR & CBR presets.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gabriel
post Jan 16 2003, 17:07
Post #5


LAME developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 2950
Joined: 1-October 01
From: Nanterre, France
Member No.: 138



QUOTE
Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.
???
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lev
post Jan 16 2003, 17:22
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: 7-November 02
From: Gloucester, UK
Member No.: 3716



What does the '???' mean?

Wrong noise shaping or not?

I know that the newer compiles of Lame have 'disadvantaged' APS... ph34r.gif


--------------------
http://www.megalev.co.uk
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Daffy
post Jan 16 2003, 17:23
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 189
Joined: 30-September 01
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 114



QUOTE (NeoRenegade @ Jan 16 2003 - 11:02 AM)
Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.

I personally would recommend 3.90.2 for the VBR presets, and 3.93.1 for the ABR & CBR presets.

You state 3.92 and later is screwed up (without backing that up, btw), and then recommend 3.93.1. Isn't 3.93.1 later than 3.92?

Clarify your claims please.

EDIT: My mistake. I now see you recommend 3.93.1 for ABR and CBR. However, I disagree with your claim that 3.92 APS is screwed up.

This post has been edited by Daffy: Jan 16 2003, 17:26
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gabriel
post Jan 16 2003, 17:37
Post #8


LAME developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 2950
Joined: 1-October 01
From: Nanterre, France
Member No.: 138



Noise shaping is the same between 3.90.2, 3.91, 3.92, 3.93.1.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LordofStars
post Jan 16 2003, 18:19
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 353
Joined: 28-April 02
Member No.: 1894



'tis only 3.93 that comes unreccomended.


--------------------
r3mix zealot.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dev0
post Jan 16 2003, 18:24
Post #10





Group: Developer
Posts: 1679
Joined: 23-December 01
From: Germany
Member No.: 731



We've been through this so many times...
The differences between 3.90.2 and 3.92 are:
- changed compiler options, that might cause a slight modification in bitrate;
- support for CBR/ABR alt-presets for bitrates <80kbps

3.90.2 is still the HA approved, most tested and fastest version, so if you don't need any of the 'features' of 3.92 or 3.93.1 use it!

dev0


--------------------
"To understand me, you'll have to swallow a world." Or maybe your words.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th December 2014 - 09:11