IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
[TOS #8] From: Vinyl rip to mp3, From Topic ID: 92536
riddermark
post Jan 6 2012, 18:35
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 24-December 11
Member No.: 96003



Hi ! I didn't mean to necro this thread but I've done some reading on your wiki page and found out about that wma pro codec. So I converted the source files to WMA Pro 24bit and 96khz and I must say I feel a nice difference to the 320kbps mp3, with just a few MBs over the mp3 size and I managed to keep the original source's attributes (well at least the 24bit and 96khz ones, the bitrate needed to get lower).

So yeah thanks again for replying here and for the helpful articles u have online biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pdq
post Jan 6 2012, 18:54
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 3372
Joined: 1-September 05
From: SE Pennsylvania
Member No.: 24233



QUOTE (riddermark @ Jan 6 2012, 13:35) *
Hi ! I didn't mean to necro this thread but I've done some reading on your wiki page and found out about that wma pro codec. So I converted the source files to WMA Pro 24bit and 96khz and I must say I feel a nice difference to the 320kbps mp3, with just a few MBs over the mp3 size and I managed to keep the original source's attributes (well at least the 24bit and 96khz ones, the bitrate needed to get lower).

So yeah thanks again for replying here and for the helpful articles u have online biggrin.gif

Without ABX test results, this is a violation of TOS #8.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lvqcl
post Jan 6 2012, 18:57
Post #3





Group: Developer
Posts: 3327
Joined: 2-December 07
Member No.: 49183



QUOTE
I feel a nice difference


Feel, but don't hear?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
riddermark
post Jan 6 2012, 20:50
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 24-December 11
Member No.: 96003



QUOTE
Without ABX test results, this is a violation of TOS #8.


Wrong. I'm not trying to convince anyone about anything. Just sharing. And yes "hear" my bad. Of course it might be just me being delusional.

What I'm trying to say is - I'm glad I found a way to preserve some of the source's attributes. Nothing more.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lvqcl
post Jan 6 2012, 20:55
Post #5





Group: Developer
Posts: 3327
Joined: 2-December 07
Member No.: 49183



QUOTE
I'm not trying to convince anyone about anything


So what? "All members that put forth a statement concerning subjective sound quality, must ... provide objective support for their claims".
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th July 2014 - 04:47