Open vs Closed headphones
Reply #13 – 2015-03-24 10:27:51
Real world examples? Audeze, Hifiman, Oppo come to mind. (It's ironic that great bass extension is ascribed to planar magnetics, when it seems more like these designs require a pretty strong seal in order to achieve this extension in the first place.) Or something like the Fidelio L1.That is my experience. Some headphones straddle any conceptual boundary line. MDR 7506s for example. Well, the foam pads on-ear was an example of the opposite 'extreme'. I think the middle ground for an "open" headphone is an open-back and breathable earpads, so just a bit of seal in the front and almost none in the back.The laws of physics intrude, again. A sealed back on a pair of headphones create an infinite baffle loudspeaker, and a tight seal around the outer earpieces create a small room. From a comfort standpoint, the sealed backs don't seem to make much difference for comfort, but the tight seal around the outer earpieces create the love/hate situation. Just because the outer earpiece fits tightly doesn't mean that the headphones have to be uncomfortable, and just because there's no outer seal doesn't mean that the comfort level is high. I think there's a mixup here. When I speak about the back then I mean the rear of the cup that is pointing away from the head, where you usually see some kind of mesh in open(-back) headphones. But I understand what you mean. Closed-back can give this sealed-in feeling, similar to in-ears. (also see occlusion effect) Comfort is a very individual thing. Some don't mind the earpads touching the ears, or the sealing earpads causing heat to build up ... what certainly causes discomfort is when part of the outer ear pushes against a hard part inside the earcups, or some stupid knobs on the headband, or too high clamping pressure.