IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Closed TopicStart new topic
Double-blind test of SACD and DVD-A vs. Redbook 16/44 in JAES Septembe, (hint: no surprises!) (bumped from 2007 in post #35)
Nessuno
post Jan 28 2013, 15:25
Post #76





Group: Members
Posts: 423
Joined: 16-December 10
From: Palermo
Member No.: 86562



QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jan 28 2013, 14:04) *
I've yet to hear this magical vinyl set-up that plays wide dynamic range classical music without audible flaws during the quiet passages.

Uh? Regarding classical, wider dynamic range is maybe the only advantage that even the most diehard vinylists acknowledge to digital.

Maybe I've already told it: I have a couple CDs of symphonic music from early '80 with a great red "WARNING" written on the first page of the booklet together with an advice not to turn up too much on quieter passages not to damage speakers on subsequent fortissimi... wink.gif

Edit: for example this CD.

This post has been edited by Nessuno: Jan 28 2013, 15:27


--------------------
... I live by long distance.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Arnold B. Kruege...
post Jan 28 2013, 19:24
Post #77





Group: Members
Posts: 4478
Joined: 29-October 08
From: USA, 48236
Member No.: 61311



QUOTE (eretsua @ Jan 25 2013, 18:14) *
So the point I'm getting at is this: I think it is the kind of mastering as they do for vinyl what the people really like, the people who prefer vinyl over cd, of course.


More likely, vinyl sells to people for whom it is new and its warts seem like beauty marks, and to people for whom it is old and its warts seems like beauty marks.

QUOTE
Maybe it is that of the modern vinyl pressing have a greater dynamic range than their cd counterparts.


Not a chance. They made the mistake of releasing test records on "modern vinyl pressings" so that technical types can measure its dynamic range. It's about 30 dB shy of what its CD counterparts can do.

QUOTE
Maybe it is the differences in the depth of the bass or some such.


The differences in the depth of bass or some such is that vinyl doesn't have greater depth, it has audibly far less depth.

QUOTE
Maybe it is related to something else.


Yes, naivete and sentimentality.

QUOTE
But I don't think it is related to the physical medium itself and that if they are not visually exposed to the medium they'd still prefer the vinyl-style mastering over the mastering intended for cd reproduction.


It is only a very tiny minority that prefers vinyl.

QUOTE
And I still stand by my idea that putting on a vinyl is more of an effort and that has a positive influence on the experience of music.


Good thing that you stand by your ideas... ;-)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Jan 28 2013, 19:54
Post #78





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10338
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jan 28 2013, 05:04) *
I'm totally lost.

You and I both.


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Jan 28 2013, 20:03
Post #79





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10338
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Jan 28 2013, 10:24) *
QUOTE
Maybe it is that of the modern vinyl pressing have a greater dynamic range than their cd counterparts.

Not a chance. They made the mistake of releasing test records on "modern vinyl pressings" so that technical types can measure its dynamic range. It's about 30 dB shy of what its CD counterparts can do.

Time for my 180.

I think he means "mastering" instead of pressing, implying that usually heavy DRC is often only applied to CD releases of titles.

If you want to join in on a discussion over that subject, here's a recent one:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=98199


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
krabapple
post Jan 29 2013, 05:12
Post #80





Group: Members
Posts: 2518
Joined: 18-December 03
Member No.: 10538



QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jan 28 2013, 09:04) *
I'm totally lost.



Why?

True differences between vinyl and CD issues, such as exist, can be *at minimum* attributed to mastering (with all that entails), and to inherent audio issues with the analog technology. (Unless you believe that digital has inherent audible issues too)

I think you know this already....?


Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Jan 29 2013, 10:45
Post #81


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5364
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



I was lost with who suggested we blind tested what. It doesn't matter.

I'm quite clear that both vinyl and CD can sometimes sound the same (to my ears), but CD is sonically transparent to the source (to my ears) while vinyl often isn't (to almost anyone's ears!).

I do have a lot of records, and some decent turntables - but I can't take it too seriously. I don't look for, or expect, perfection. That would be to invite disappointment. I get easily as much fun out of my mp3 player.

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Jun 15 2013, 01:22
Post #82





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10338
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



Due to the two off-topic posts in the last 24 hours, this thread will close. If you wish to talk specifically about the study send me a PM and I will consider re-opening the discussion.


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd December 2014 - 02:40